See All Care Nursing Service, 887 F.2d 1535; Forts v. Ward, 566 F.2d 849, 851 (2d Cir.1977) (dopp city v. Franklin National Bank, 461 F.2d 873, 879 (2d Cir.1972) (sims v. Greene, 161 F.2d 87, 88 (3d Cir.1947))) ( « In general, a judge should obviously not resolve a factual dispute over insurance or affidavits, as he or she only shows a preference for « one piece of paper over another. » »); Campbell Soup Co. v. Giles, 47 F.3d 467, 470 (1st cir.1995) (cited sec v. Frank, 388 F.2d 486, 491 (2d Cir.1968)) (« In the parties` competing versions of the relevant facts, the veracity of the claim of omission depends on the finding of credibility, « the inadequacy of the action based on sworn insurance reaches [itself] its maximum. » »); Elliott v. Gravel Time, 98 F.3d 47, 53 (3d Cir.1996) (citing Professional Plan Examiners of New Jersey, Inc. v.
Lefante, 750 F.2d 282, 288 (3d Cir.1984)) (« A district court may not make an interim order dependent on the resolution of contentious issues unless the court first has a trial of evidence »); Ty, Inc. v. GMA Accessories, Inc., 132 F.3d 1167, 1171 (7th Cir.1997) (citing Medeco Security Locks, Inc. . . .